Hi,
Keep in mind I am not a hard-core "hacker" just a guy who needs to develop tools to be used within my domain.
I find the docs sketchy, too many times I have had to investigate source to find out what is really going on
and the docs lacks a good focused set of examples on how to use the various classes.
A UML based overview of the whole class hierarchy would also be great (which was a great help when i was using MapObjects)
I guess others will disagree.....
But me and OpenMap live happily with these shortcoming :-)
Geir
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-openmap-users_at_bbn.com [mailto:owner-openmap-users_at_bbn.com] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Knauth
Sent: 20. mars 2006 13:53
To: openmap questions
Subject: Re: [OpenMap Users] Geo-tiff or geo-registered image support
On Mar 20, 2006, at 02:13, Geir Øvsttun (AS/ETO) wrote:
> On the other hand I consider OpenMap a bit more rough on the edges,
> documentation stinks in comparision, the class structure is a bit more
> confusing, but the code is solid and straightforward to use and I have
> not encountered any bugs.
I'm curious. What would make the documentation better for you?
Geoffrey
--
Geoffrey S. Knauth | http://knauth.org/gsk
--
[To unsubscribe to this list send an email to "majdart_at_bbn.com"
with the following text in the BODY of the message "unsubscribe openmap-users"]
--
[To unsubscribe to this list send an email to "majdart_at_bbn.com"
with the following text in the BODY of the message "unsubscribe openmap-users"]
Received on Tue Mar 21 2006 - 07:05:35 EST